Our
Insights

Author: Bick Law LLP

When Contamination is Discovered Mid-Transaction: Legal Obligations and Smart Next Steps

Tue Sep 23rd, On Environmental Law, by

Environmental due diligence is a key aspect of any commercial real estate transaction. In an ideal scenario, the buyer’s environmental due diligence will confirm (with a reasonable degree of certainty) that there are no contamination issues associated with the property, and this will allow all parties involved to move forward with confidence. Buyers can engage a California environmental attorney to assist with their due diligence—including conducting Phase I and Phase […]

McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson: Implications for Pre-Enforcement Review in Environmental Law

Tue Sep 16th, On Environmental Law, by

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision that could have far-reaching implications for various types of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement proceedings. While the case under review did not involve environmental issues—instead, it involved allegations that the defendant sent unsolicited advertisements via fax in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)—the Court’s decision is broad enough that it could impact the enforcement of various environmental […]

Managing Clean Water Act Compliance: What Businesses Need to Know About Industrial General Permit Coverage

Fri Aug 29th, On Compliance Counseling, by

Permitting is a key aspect of Clean Water Act compliance for companies doing business in California. For many companies, this includes obtaining and maintaining Industrial General Permit (IGP) coverage for businesses with industrial operations coming into contact with stormwater. If your company is required to have IGP coverage, what do you need to know about compliance? Find out from an experienced California water lawyer at Bick Law LLP. Using Industrial […]

Federal Court Declares Proposition 65 Warning Requirement for Dietary Acrylamide Unconstitutional: What’s Next?

Fri Aug 22nd, On Litigation, by

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California recently held that California’s addition of dietary acrylamide to the Proposition 65 warning list was unconstitutional. The decision came in the case of California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, which the Chamber of Commerce initially filed in 2019. While the decision is specific to dietary acrylamide, the court’s analysis provides some valuable insights for evaluating future challenges to listings under Proposition […]

Our Areas of
Practice: