Last month, we published an article on the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson. While this wasn’t an environmental case, as we discussed in the article, it nonetheless has the potential to significantly impact environmental enforcement in some cases. This is because of its implications for pre-enforcement review of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) interpretation of certain federal environmental laws. This month, […]

Read More

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), various parties can potentially be held liable for cleanup costs (among other costs) associated with property contamination. This is true regardless of whether these parties were the original source of the contamination at issue. However, various exemptions and defenses to CERCLA liability may apply—including the secured creditor defense for lenders that finance the acquisition of contaminated properties. Learn more from […]

Read More

Environmental due diligence is a key aspect of any commercial real estate transaction. In an ideal scenario, the buyer’s environmental due diligence will confirm (with a reasonable degree of certainty) that there are no contamination issues associated with the property, and this will allow all parties involved to move forward with confidence. Buyers can engage a California environmental attorney to assist with their due diligence—including conducting Phase I and Phase […]

Read More

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision that could have far-reaching implications for various types of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement proceedings. While the case under review did not involve environmental issues—instead, it involved allegations that the defendant sent unsolicited advertisements via fax in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)—the Court’s decision is broad enough that it could impact the enforcement of various environmental […]

Read More